User talk:Thomas Meng

Sonata for Keyboard Four-hands in C major K. 521 (Mozart), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GeneralPoxter (talk) 13:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Yu Wensheng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simply does not pass WP:GNG, case of WP:BIO1E. Would have redirected to the article on the protests, except he's not even mentioned there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 14:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Thanks for making the notice. I have expanded the article significantly since, and I think it meets WP:GNG and WP:BIO1E now. Welcome to take a look and your suggestions are always appreciated. Best, Thomas Meng (talk) 03:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Yu Wensheng[edit]

Hello, Thomas Meng,

Thank you for creating Yu Wensheng.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The currently cited sources appear to be campaigning on behalf of the article's subject, and the text of the article is not neutrally phrased. The article could be improved by adding more neutral content from reliable sources; I conducted a preliminary internet search and found several promising sources such as [1], [2]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 20:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Thank you very much for your suggestions. I have included the two sources you provided and have significantly improved the neutrality of the article. Welcome to have a look! Thanks again, Thomas Meng (talk) 03:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ngo's congressional testimony[edit]

You restored this text to the Andy Ngo article.[[3]] There is a related discussion here[[4]]. Springee (talk) 04:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Springee, thanks for letting me know. Sorry I've been busy with schoolwork for the past few weeks and haven't had time to participate. I will take a more thorough look at this issue and drop my comment/edit where appropriate.
Thanks, Thomas Meng (talk) 22:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radio Free Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Burke. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ni Yulan[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ni Yulan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aussie Article Writer -- Aussie Article Writer (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning RfC[edit]

I have reworded the RfC on Radio Free Asia so that the questions asked and subsequent surveying are more clear. Please move your response to the category of your choice if you wish to do so, and apologies for the formatting. Paragon Deku (talk) 00:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Requesting Procedural Close by administrator at Talk:Radio Free Asia, per WP:GS/UYGHUR. Thank you.— Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:45, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ni Yulan[edit]

The article Ni Yulan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ni Yulan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aussie Article Writer -- Aussie Article Writer (talk) 01:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Women in Green wikiproject would like to add Ni Yulan to the listed GA articles here. Would you be alright with this? - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 10:29, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aussie Article Writer: Yeah for sure! Thanks for letting me know :) Thomas Meng (talk) 12:34, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 12:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 July 2021[edit]

The Signpost: 29 August 2021[edit]

The Signpost: 26 September 2021[edit]

DYK for Ni Yulan[edit]

On 10 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ni Yulan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that civil-rights lawyer Ni Yulan, sentenced after recording the forced demolition of homes to make way for the 2008 Beijing Olympics, was prevented from leaving China to accept awards? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ni Yulan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ni Yulan), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying Maile66 :) Thomas Meng (talk) 03:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2021[edit]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2021[edit]

The Signpost: 28 December 2021[edit]

The Signpost: 30 January 2022[edit]

Happy Chinese New Year![edit]

恭喜发财!

Happy Chinese New Year!

🐯🐯🐯 — Mhawk10 (talk) 02:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhawk10: Happy Chinese new year to you as well! 🐯 Thomas Meng (talk) 03:46, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pytest (February 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 14:10, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Thomas Meng! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 14:10, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Slywriter: thanks for taking the time to review Draft:Pytest. I've read your comment and want to know more about the specific ways of improvement. Since pytest is the most popular testing framework in Python, I do think it's worth creating a Wikipedia aritcle for. Currently there are five independent sources cited: two published books, one article from the developers at DropBox, one from Real Python, another from Python Insight. The other two are primary sources from the pytest official documentation.
There are more independent sources that cover pytest. But I want to know exatly which direction I should make the article go before I proceed. Could you be a little more specific? (same comment at your talk page; please reply at whichever place that's more convenient for you)Thomas Meng (talk) 03:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looking for a book/article that isn't a quick start guide. Anything that looks like a reliable source wrote about pytest without personal gain from writing about it. Dropbox isn't quite a reliable source, at least for notability. Python Insight and Real Python look to be blogs, so also not ideal for Wikipedia notability.
I took a second look and what jumps at me is that its clearly notable in the Python community, but less clear that it has notability as wikipedia states it. I do think its extremely close to the line and another independent source or two would put it over. Hope that makes senseSlywriter (talk) 03:51, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Slywriter: Thank you for explaining. I just added two more sources along with some more content on pytest's notable features. Thomas Meng (talk) 03:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2022[edit]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pytest has been accepted[edit]

Pytest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 March 2022[edit]

Tech News: 2022-15[edit]

19:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pytest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parametrization.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-16[edit]

23:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022[edit]

DYK nomination of Pytest[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Pytest at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset: Thanks for the notice. The article is in the process of being improved based on latest suggestions given on the nomination page. More improvments will come shortly, and when everything's ready, I'll reply back on that page. Thomas Meng (talk) 01:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-17[edit]

22:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-18[edit]

19:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pytest[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pytest you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErrantX -- ErrantX (talk) 18:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-19[edit]

15:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pytest[edit]

The article Pytest you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pytest for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErrantX -- ErrantX (talk) 08:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-20[edit]

18:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-21[edit]

00:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 May 2022[edit]

Tech News: 2022-22[edit]

20:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-23[edit]

02:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-24[edit]

16:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Pytest[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Pytest at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-25[edit]

20:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pytest[edit]

The article Pytest you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pytest for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErrantX -- ErrantX (talk) 09:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 June 2022[edit]

Tech News: 2022-26[edit]

20:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-27[edit]

19:31, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-28[edit]

19:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-29[edit]

22:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Pytest[edit]

On 21 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pytest, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the software-testing framework pytest has been described as a key ecosystem project for the Python programming language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pytest. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pytest), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-30[edit]

19:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2022[edit]

Tech News: 2022-31[edit]

21:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-32[edit]

19:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-33[edit]

21:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-34[edit]

00:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-35[edit]

23:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2022[edit]

Tech News: 2022-36[edit]

23:20, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-37[edit]

01:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-38[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:15, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-39[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 September 2022[edit]

Tech News: 2022-40[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-41[edit]

14:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-42[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-43[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2022[edit]

Tech News: 2022-44[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-45[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-46[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-47[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:20, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 November 2022[edit]