User talk:Sethant

Archives:

• 2004: Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
• 2005: Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
• 2006: Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
• 2007: Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
• 2008: Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
• 2009: Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
• 2010: Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
• 2011: Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
• 2012: Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall
• 2013: Winter

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barry Hess is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Hess until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 16:27, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth Brett here just did assignment 5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwilrenewable (talk • contribs) 21:35, 7 June 2013 (UTC) Hey Seth this is Alex letting you know that I just did assignment #4. Please check it out. AlexAlexander.reese (talk) 20:40, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dr. Anthony this is Brett Wilson I have created my account. (Bwilrenewable (talk) 06:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Hello Seth, This is Alex Reese letting you know that I have created an account.

Alex Alexander.reese (talk) 02:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Santhony!! I have created that wiki account. Have a jolly good day. Thanks, Michelle Cirrito Mcirrito912 (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, I've created my user page. (Stockroom Asst.) REEstudent (talk) 23:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, Is there a way to go to articles that have been listed as needing editing? It was one of the choices when I first logged in, but now I cannot find it. REEstudent (talk) 23:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've joined the troops. - Forest F. Tree19 (talk) 20:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seth!

I hope this is the correct place to contact you... I am new to Wikipedia!

Thanks! Krista Kristagoit (talk) 23:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Anthony, My article edits are now live http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_energy_conversion thanks Michael.weeks (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, I finally created my user page here on wiki. I'm still getting used to this whole process but it will only take time.

BeatlesFan65 (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC) (Benjamin Morris)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, It was the same page I saw when I first signed on. Thanks! Also, it appears that you cannot insert a comma into a section heading. This section was hidden from view because it was called "Seth," instead of just "Seth". Good to know! REEstudent (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth, I just finished my three small corrections here on Wiki. I just wanted to let you know Thanks, BeatlesFan65 (talk) 22:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC) Benjamin Morris[reply]

I, Michael P., have made my user page for the first assignment. Nightingale8283 (talk) 22:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have made my three corrections. -Michael P. Nightingale8283 (talk) 22:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again!

I think I got more than three changes... Let me know if I did this correctly!

Thanks!

Kristagoit (talk) 00:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth,

Just letting you know that I have created a wikipedia account, and edited a few things. See you in the morning!

Sincerely, Alyssa

Amd9 (talk) 07:07, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, here's my short note. Enjoy your weekend! Kaleb "Kaleb.LT (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)"[reply]

Hey Seth, just letting you know I've made my 3 corrections. Thanks! Kaleb "Kaleb.LT (talk) 21:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)"[reply]

Dr. Anthony, I have made corrections to the following three articles: Second Merkel Cabinet for spelling, grammar, and clarity. Braking action for links to other articles and clarity. Limbo (dance) for spelling, grammar, and clarity. REEstudent (talk) 18:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Made the corrections Tree19 (talk) 21:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Anthony account created.(Michael.weeks (talk) 20:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Seth!

I made edits to annoying verbiage in the "Pyrolysis" article. I validated the changes before sending this, but I didn't notice anything that showed the text was changed, but then I'm a newbie.

Later ChrisB WIGEfan (talk) 20:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dr. Anthony,

This is Helen Allen from your CHEM 260 class writing to let you know that I have created an account on Wikipidia!

Kind Regards,

Heleniliff (talk) 21:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, I have completed the necessary steps in creating my user page and have found your talk page, as you may have noticed. Sincerely, KVuong (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth, I have made my 3 minor edits as follows: Shuggie Otis minor wording change. Photovoltaics minor wording change. Ferrofluid minor punctuation change.

Thank you kindly, KVuong (talk) 02:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, I made my account and hope to make some corrections here soon!

Thanks, Justin 

Wallace.miller (talk) 02:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth Anthony, I have created my account. Thanks, Danielle Sayres. ("Dsports1 (talk) 04:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)")[reply]

Hey Proffessor, here is the note you asked for.

Eric Reynolds ("OITowl3 (talk) 04:07, 22 April 2013 (UTC)")[reply]

Kirwan Fox dropped by to say hi, and let you know I signed up. Now I'm off to edit something. Then I'll be lurking at iHop until the wee hours.

EDIT I have now also completed Part 2 of this assignment. I have a dream of riding this train to Lhasa some day. I fixed a few date formatting and grammatical errors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qinghai%E2%80%93Tibet_Railway See you at iHop.

Bye for now Drew.P.Branch (talk) 04:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is with my name and everything. Nathan.garrelts (talk) 04:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey seth, finished my editing.

Eric Reynolds — Preceding unsigned comment added by OITowl3 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that I got my page created. Hannah.dimich (talk) 05:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth,

Just letting you know that I got my 3 edits done. Hannah.dimich (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola Seth!

Just letting you know I got my page up

~Will

Willdogg698 (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know I've made 3 edits to the Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion page!

~Will

Willdogg698 (talk) 07:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, I have made my three corrections. Thank you, Danielle Sayres (Dsports1 (talk) 15:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Seth, I definitely did not forget to do this assignment which is why I'm sending you this message now.

Clee845 (talk) 15:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fill

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octalux

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Movement_(literature)

I tried my best they where minor ones.Michael.weeks (talk) 01:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, just finished completing my edits on three Wikipedia articles.

Clee845 (talk) 02:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've got logged in Seth.

Chris Pittenger

(Pitts0608 (talk) 16:43, 23 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Good Afternoon Dr. Anthony,

I made three typo corrections to the pages, 'Vasos Vacios", and 'Gelbelsee".

Thanks!

Helen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heleniliff (talk • contribs) 17:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel Bliss has created a page Anotherleap (talk) 21:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, I found four topics in which I feel need to be revised. These two topic do not have enough information presented:Electrochemical Battery and Fuel Cell. These two topics need to be interpreted so that anyone with a basic understanding of chemistry could understand the message: Electrochemical Cell and Electrochemical Potential. The Electrochemical Battery page does not have very much information. I could talk about the different kinds of batteries and add a basic chemical understanding of the functionality behind this process. The Fuel Cell page could use a few more examples of how fuel cells can be used. The Electrochemical Cell page needs to be written in a way that more people could understand it, especially in the Equilibrium reaction section. The Electrochemical Potential page needs to be more understandable, especially in the parts where it discusses the concepts of thermodynamics and equilibrium. I hope this is everything you are looking for.

Alex ReeseAlexander.reese (talk) 21:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth,

The four topics that I found which need revisions are:

• Faraday's laws of electrolysis
• Battery (electricity)
• half-reaction
• Electrochemical cell

The Faraday’s laws page does not have very much information, and the explanation of the laws is chunked and awkward to read through. I found myself getting a bit lost through it, and feel it should be broken down much further so that someone with only a basic understanding of chemistry could understand the concepts.

The Electrochemical Battery page has information about the uses and various types of batteries, but the page lacks the science behind the technology. A basic chemical understanding should be added to this page.

I was surprised by the half-reaction page in that it seems to be missing a substantial amount of information. A component that could be added to this page is half-reactions in acidic vs. basic conditions. The explanation is very brief, and uses some more advanced chemical terminology that a basic chemistry student may not understand.

A more advanced knowledge of chemistry would be necessary in order to navigate the Electrochemical cell page. Much of the terminology used is more advanced and left unexplained to the reader. Further, the chemistry content could be expanded on, and the significance of the electrochemical cell should be emphasized.

Thanks, Alyssa Amd9 (talk) 06:09, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I completed the three edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitts0608 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have to admit while educational this was a very difficult task for me. I did the best I could and hope it is good enough or what you are looking for.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_energy_conversion

very vague. I would hope it would have more than just one reference to an article. Maybe more on the conversion process not sure

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biobattery

How it works section is not complete I don't think.Protons H+ and E- which make electricity doesn't sound right The chemical equation isn't blanced properly under process.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_battery

the reaction isn't balanced properly. Shouldn't this statement have a citation or reference > "Aluminium-chlorine battery was patented by United States Air Force in the 1970s and designed mostly for military applications. They use aluminium anodes and chlorine on graphite substrate cathodes. Required elevated temperatures to be operational."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinc%E2%80%93air_battery

cathode reaction has a 1/2 O2 is that even possible?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkaline_fuel_cell

unbalanced chemical reaction

Michael.weeks (talk) 20:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  The four articles I found that could use some work are half-reaction, battery (electricity), chemical reaction, and Daniell cell.    With half-reaction, the coverage seemed extremely short. It could maybe mention how it works under different conditions.   For battery (electricity), there could be more definition for batterey components instead of facts about sales for previous years.    The chemical reaction article uses some technical terms and is an extremely long description. It could be made easier to understand and could also be shortened so there is not as much unnecessary information.   For the Daniell cell, there are way too many technical terms that could be confusing to someone with little or no chemistry background. 

(Dsports1 (talk) 20:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemistry There is no recent developments listed past the 1970’s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxidation The portion explaining reduction potentials could be explained more clearly and intensively.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemistry The portion explaining how to balance reactions in acidic conditions uses a fairly complicated reaction. Simpler reactions would be easier to understand.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemistry The same goes for balancing reactions in basic conditions. It’s too complicated and can be explained more effectively.

OITowl3 (talk) 01:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, The two articles I found that were too short/missing something are:

• Water-activated battery A very short article that is not clear as to why these batteries have less heavy metals than regular batteries.
• Solid-state battery The second sentence makes claims about materials in the batteries, but is unclear about what materials it is referring to. I suspect that it may be referring to the solid electrolytes. It is also a very short page.

The two articles I found that were too technical are:

• Lithium-air battery The operation section of this article is hard to understand with a lot of organic lingo.
• Flow battery The description made my brain tired. It contained technical words I have never heard of and it failed to reference them. The rest of the article was similar.

REEstudent (talk) 02:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth, Lacking information Electrochemical cell could use an example of how to calculate the difference in voltage. Electrode potential under the Measurement section, they mention a center electrode, but never mention its purpose.

Too technical Fuel cell the half reaction equations should have the molecules name either beside or under it, so people know what they are and the table further down the page is very hard to read, follow, and has no rhyme or reason to its order Tree19 (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth,

My User Page is now online and I can start editing wikipedia now.

-Matthew LaCount ("Mlacount82891 (talk) 02:26, 29 April 2013 (UTC)")[reply]

Hey Seth,

Here is assignment number three:

I am going to add some more information to electrochemical cells. It seems like there is quite a bit missing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_cell

I am going to improve the science behind solar cells. It seems to skip over the science and just talk about efficiency and cost, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photovoltaic_cells

I am going to simplify some of the terms in here and add some new information. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell

I am going to simplify the science in the following article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biofuels

Thanks,

Hannah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannah.dimich (talk • contribs) 03:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth,

I found a few articles that had some grammatical or spelling errors and made some minor corrections. Thanks for your time.

-Matthew (Mlacount82891 (talk) 03:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

I have found some articles that could use some attention: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faradaic_current This section seemed a bit short. I think a little more information is needed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_notation This section also seemed short and what was included needed to be dumbed down a bit for those who didn't have much science background. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biophotovoltaic This article is only two sentences. Elaboration is definitely required. A picture or diagram would be nice, too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrocapillarity Fairly short article with a lot of technical information. Maybe a rewrite could include a little more for the less informed reader. Nightingale8283 (talk) 03:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kirwan Fox found some pages which could use some improvement.

Pages missing information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-reaction
This is only a brief description of what a half-reaction is, and is not nearly adequate even for a layman
to understand it. There is no explanation of any of the myriad of uses of the half-reaction in chemistry, or what is happening
to electrons during oxidation or reduction, or how to identify the differences.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_battery
This is not so much a problem with a page, but a suggestion to add this page to the battery types category.
There are quite a few historical references to early batteries in the battery types category. While it is true there
is disagreement about whether this is really the first galvanic cell predating our modern versions by a 1000 years, it
is important to point out this is an ancient device which had that capability, though it's real use cannot be confirmed.
EDIT - just noticed a reference to this on the galvanic cell page. That might be enough.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_energy_conversion
This is an incredibly short inadequate page which even teases the reader with how important this is to new automotive technology.
Expansion badly needed!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drew.P.Branch (talk • contribs) 06:04, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pages utilizing terminology a bit too technical
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemiluminescence
I really had a hard time understanding some of the terms on this page.
It is really too short to be a technical article, rather it should be simplified a bit for the layman.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protonic_ceramic_fuel_cell
I thought this page didn't have very clear explanations.
There are quite a few acronyms which could be expanded to include either links to description pages,
or explanations of what they mean.

Drew.P.Branch (talk) 05:07, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seth,

For my third assignment, I was going to modify the following articles:

Electrochemical cell is a very short page. I feel that I could add new information (including some example reactions), along with modifying the somewhat wordy language.

Chemical energy is another VERY short page. It seems to me that they may be trying to explain the ΔG° concept we've been discussing in class, however I may be interpreting the term "chemical energy" incorrectly.

Spontaneous reaction starts off sounding very confusing to a person seeking general knowledge. The overview seems a little more well-written. I would like to focus on cleaning up the introduction.

Saturation (chemistry) is very short and seems to assume quite a bit of chemistry/science knowledge on the reader's part. I would like to explain some of the chemistry terms in more plain language.

Willdogg698 (talk) 05:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dr. Anthony,

I have found four articles/pages that I reckon could use some fixing.

1) "Solar panels on spacecraft". This article seems like it should be addressed to a general audience, but it seems still to have some rather technical words that I do not understand. For example, 'figure of merit', and 'telemetry'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_panels_on_spacecraft

2) The page "Electrochemical gradient", could be written to a more general audience if the terms were more broadly defined. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_gradient

3) The "Faraday's constant" page was a bit short. It seems like there could be more said about the electric charge per mole of electrons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_constant

4) The page, "Polarization (electrochemistry)", is confusing to the lay person (a.k.a., me). An equation or some diagram would help the concept be more easily understood. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_%28electrochemistry%29

Thanks!

Helen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heleniliff (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Here are my two articles that are short or absent:

Half Reactions

There is little data on half reactions, and it does not come up automatically when searched for in the Wikipedia bar.

Laws of Thermodynamics -> History

The history aspect of the laws of thermodynamics is barely touched upon and could be expanded upon.

These are my two articles that are too technical:

Flow Battery -> Cases of Flow Batteries

This part of the article is especially technical, assuming the reader has previous knowledge on electrochemistry basics.

Ions -> Chemistry

Most of this article would be difficult for a person with average intelligence of chemistry to understand.

Thanks! Kristagoit (talk) 03:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Electrolysis The introductory definition is slightly technical and hard to understand without any chemistry knowledge. It also could be more specific on the useful applications of electrolysis instead of only listing ores in the introduction.

Electroosmotic pump The information given is hard to understand, a section with less jargon should be included.

Magnesium-air fuel cell lacks anything more than a general sentence. Needs to have further elaboration.

Potassium-ion battery The information is general, there should be a section on applications and installations and a more specific description of the chemical process. KVuong (talk) 04:10, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rechargeable Battery - Section on damage to cells over time doesn't explain reason.

Oxidation - Etymology section is a little confusing when mentioning "hydrogenation."

Ion - A memory aide section would be helpful in remembering the difference between cations and anions.

Electropositivity - Little information is given and more would be helpful.

Thanks Seth,

Kaleb T. Kaleb.LT (talk) 05:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power

For this section there is a lot of differnet options for power. Adding a link for Power (chemistry) and placing some of what we have done could help this page. It seems like someone would have to look through a lot to get what we are looking for.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage

In the definition it has in words "Voltage is electric potential energy per unit charge, measured in joules per coulomb ( = volts)". I think this would be more helpful if this was more visual. (Volts=Joules/Coulombs) bolded and by itself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_current

In our notes we show that "Current:(Amperes=Coulombs/Second)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_bridge This seems that they are only saying two items could create a salt bring. It also doesn't give a good disscprition about the process. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitts0608 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seth, here are some articles I found that need some work:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmotic_power#Efficiency This article explained what Osmotic Power was well but lacked information on the efficiency of using Osmotic Power, kind of like a "benefits" section per se.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrode This article was surprisingly short, and has the basics of what an electrode is, but lacks information on the specifics of how they work.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equilibrium_constant The article gives a brief overview of what the equilibrium constant K that might sound too technical for those who have not studied the subject as of yet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_current One sentence that says "An ion current is the influx and/or efflux of ions through an ion channel."

Clee845 (talk) 19:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Created the user account for wikipedia.

Xlutzsethx (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have now editied 3 articles for minor errors.

Xlutzsethx (talk) 17:55, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seth, I have written some proposed changes to the half-reaction page. They are in my sandbox. FYI, the original page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-reaction

Drew.P.Branch (talk) 04:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, Just wanted to let you know that I just finished Wiki assignment #4 and have made some proposed changes for you to review. Let me know what you think. Thanks, Benjamin — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeatlesFan65 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, I have edited my article. Let me know if I need to make any changes. Thanks! "Dsports1 (talk) 02:12, 13 May 2013 (UTC)"[reply]

Hey Seth,

I got assignment #4 done. There was a reference error in the stuff I copied over, that I don't know how to fix. I just didn't worry about it sense it was not in my new text.

Thanks, Hannah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannah.dimich (talk • contribs) 02:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, Finished up assignment 4, and am awaiting review. Nightingale8283 (talk) 04:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth, Just finished Assignment 4 and thanks for the help yesterday Tree19 (talk) 21:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just finished up with Assignment 4 if I did it correctly! Thanks! Kristagoit (talk) 06:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, Assignment four is ready for your review. I summarized the introduction in what I feel is easier to understand lingo, and I added in a definition (electroactive species). I did my best to cite it, although I am not sure I did the citation "correctly". I couldn't figure out the automatic insert citation thing, so I just copied the markup of other users. One other thing: I did not know to save the original page in my sandbox before I edited it. The version in my sandbox is not the same as the version on the actual wikipedia article, and cannot be directly compared from my sandbox. Sorry! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:REEstudent/sandbox REEstudent (talk) 04:55, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dr. Anthony,

I decided to edit the section called "Reducing Agent". I copied below the changes that I made. I am open to any suggestions!

Reducing agents and oxidizing agents are the ones responsible for corrosion, which is the “degradation of a solid, usually a metal, as a result of electrochemical activity”.^[1] The word corrosion comes from the Latin word, corrodere, which literally means "to gnaw away". Corrosion requires an negative electrodeanode, and a positive electrode cathode, to take place. The anode is an element that loses electrons (reducing agent), thus oxidation always occurs in the anode, and the cathode is an element that gains electrons (oxidizing agent), thus reduction always occurs in the cathode. This process can be used in electrolysis to generate electricity. Corrosion occurs whenever there’s a difference in oxidation potential. When there is an oxidation potential, the anode metal begins deteriorating, given there is an electrical connection and the presence of an electrolyte.

Thanks!

Helen Allen CHE 260

My sandbox is ready for review just a day late and a dollar short!Michael.weeks (talk) 03:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth here are my articles for assignment # 3

Electrochemical Cells could use some more information and lacks depth.

Half-cell Is another article that is really short and could use more information.

Lithium-ion battery is an article that could be simplified in some parts. The introduction is a little vocab intensive.

Electrolytic Cell Is another article that could be simplified due to some of its technical content.

For assignment # 4, I chose to edit the Half-Cell article and add what I thought to be more usefull information in understanding what a Half-cell is.

Thanks for your time, hope you have a great time in Arizona -Matthew LaCount Mlacount82891 (talk) 05:10, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry this is late but I have created my user page.

Zjmiller26 (talk) 21:27, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I finally finished it! I edited the grammar on the Géza, royal prince of Hungary page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallace.miller (talk • contribs) 04:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_cell - could use some examples, the article is kind of short , I figured I could add some examples to make it easier to understand.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-reaction - this article is very very short and I think it could use some more explanation about what half deacons are.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis - could be made easier to understand for those without much chemistry information. Change some sentences to make it easier to understand.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_reaction - it was quickly evident this was going to be a fun read, it could be worded to be more gauged for the casual reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallace.miller (talk • contribs) 05:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The key process of electrolysis is the interchange of atoms and ions by the removal or addition of electrons from the external circuit. The desired products of electrolysis are often in a different physical state from the electrolyte and can be removed by some physical processes. For example, in the electrolysis of brine to produce hydrogen and chlorine, the products are gaseous. These gaseous products bubble from the electrolyte and are collected.^[2]

The key process of electrolysis is the interchange of atoms and ions by the removal or addition of electrons from the external circuit. The process requires that an electrolyte, an ionized solution or salt, completes a circuit between two electrodes. The cathode and the anode. Reduction always occurs at the cathode while oxidation always occurs at the anode. The desired products of electrolysis are often in a different physical state from the electrolyte and can be removed by some physical processes. For example, in the electrolysis of brine to produce hydrogen and chlorine, the products are gaseous. These gaseous products bubble from the electrolyte and are collected.(Disassociated hydrogen ions gain an electron at the cathode and pair off to become hydrogen gas, and chlorine ions are attracted to the anode where they lose an electron, become chlorine atoms, pair off, and become chlorine gas) ^[2]

KVuong (talk) 17:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Heleniliff/sandbox Michael.weeks (talk) 21:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, just finished some edits, they're in my sandbox. Heres the original page:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis

Sorry for the wait! Kaleb.LT (talk) 01:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth,

I have completed assignment #5. I left comments on the person's talk page. Let me know if this does not work out. Thank you. (Dsports1 (talk) 01:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Hey Seth:

I am letting you know that I just did Assingment #5. Hopefully its what you are looking for. I also left this information on the person's sandbox page so that they could see it in hopes it would help them make a better page:

"Hey, this is very well done! I really like how you explained terms clearly. I feel that you explained this so well that someone with a very limited understanding of chemistry could follow and understand this text. One suggestion that I would make would be maybe include units and also to maybe include real world examples of how these are used. Overall, Great job! It is very thorough."

-Alex Reese — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexander.reese (talk • contribs) 02:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth,

Just wanted to let you know that I got assignment #5 done.

Hannah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannah.dimich (talk • contribs) 03:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seth I've done some revisions for assignment number 4. Right on time.

Chris Lee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clee845 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, just finished assignment 5.

Kaleb.LT (talk) 05:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth:

I just am letting you know that I just finished the second part of Assignment #5 Part two. This is what I said:

"Great Job! I really liked how thorough you are I your explanation. It is very easy to follow along, even for someone with a limited knowledge of chemistry. I feel that with these edits the article is much stronger and easier to understand. The only suggestion that I could make would be to include a mnemonic method for remembering that the oxidation occurs in the anode, while reduction occurs in the cathode. One example would be “AN OX and a RED CAT.” Then, obviously, you would have to explain how this is a good way of remembering."

Hope this is what you are looking for. Thanks!

-Alex Reese Alexander.reese (talk) 22:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, sorry this is so late. Celilo.nordal (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have just completed the second assignment, which was editing three articles slightly. I edited McCain foods, citlalicue, and a norwegian financial article that i can't remember Celilo.nordal (talk) 17:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the articles I saw that could be edited are: fluid theory of electricity. this is a very short, un-cited article. electrochemical cell. This is also un-cited, but it is slightly longer. It could use a little editing and some more information, but for the most part it's fine. electrostatics. This article was too scientific. it used equations without explaining where it got the first. electrical work. this article also used a lot of equations without telling you what they were. I'd recommend simplifying them. Celilo.nordal (talk) 17:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Made a page. Working on the Wikissignments currently. I'll keep you posted.

Greg G Robinson263 (talk) 22:00, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finished #5 Part 1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallace.miller (talk • contribs) 22:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Seth!

Made edits to the Wooly Mammoth article and the Blacktail Deer article.

G Robinson263 (talk) 22:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had some trouble figuring out the wiki super and subscript thing, but I found it and added some half-reactions in acidic and basic conditions to the half-reaction page. The changes are in my sandbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallace.miller (talk • contribs) 23:52, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Latest assignment finished awaiting the next directive Tree19 (talk) 04:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, I have finished the reviews for Wikipedia assignment #5. --REEstudent (talk) 03:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finished the second review. Tree19 (talk) 22:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of the salt bridge in electrochemical cell:

The salt bridge transfers electrons from the anode to cathode electrode to balance the charge of both electrochemical cells. Without the salt bridge there would be a surplus of positive charge stockpile at the anode and a surplus of negative stockpile at the cathode. Without the flow of electrons the reactions would stop the current to flow.

As electrons leave one half of a galvanic cell and flow to the other, a difference in charge is established. If no salt bridge were used, this charge difference would prevent further flow of electrons. A salt bridge allows the flow of ions to maintain a balance in charge between the oxidation and reduction vessels while keeping the contents of each separate. With the charge difference balanced, electrons can flow once again, and the reduction and oxidation reactions can proceed. In general, keeping the two cells separate is preferable from the point of view of eliminating variables from an experiment. When no direct contact between electrolytes is allowed, there is no need to make allowance for possible interactions between ionic species.

The technique more specifically allows freedom in the choice of ions in solution. For instance, a mixture of two different cations in solution might result in the preferential reduction of the wrong one, for the purposes of the experiment. With a salt bridge, the desired cation (positive) species is isolated in one vessel while the cation in the other vessel may be chosen to make the experiment easier, such as using a more soluble, or more stable salt of the anionic (negative) species.

If the two vessels are entirely disconnected, without a salt bridge, then the cation and anion species are also isolated, but then each species quickly reaches equilibrium because no electrical current can flow. The salt bridge can be seen as a way of completing the ionic circuit without letting the solutions intermix.

Hey Seth, i just finished my assingment 4. I made changes to the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxidation . Here is the link to my sand box, not sure how else to show you my changes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:OITowl3/sandbox . I have also looked at and commented on your reqested article for assingment 5. OITowl3 (talk) 04:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok here is the page I used http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_cell, and I edited the intro part. Here is the link to my sandbox I guess? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xlutzsethx/sandbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xlutzsethx (talk • contribs) 21:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed my edits/additions and have taken them live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallace.miller (talk • contribs) 04:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki assignment 3 Seth, hopefully these will work.

The first two articles seem to miss the mark, on important an element (or elements)

Critique #1, title: “Electrochemistry” (link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemistry) Missing Content—no link to PV Cells—really??! There is a link to semiconductors which is in the same area, but PV should be linked as well.

Critique #2, Article: “Semiconductor” (link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor)

“The conductivity of a semiconductor increases with increasing temperature, behavior opposite to that of a metal.[1] ” [This statement is true when referencing a solid piece of metal, say a metal bar, or continuous length of wire; however, it often falls by the wayside when the conductor is an element in a circuit that includes a reactive load such as an AC motor. A reference to a related article would be helpful.]

The articles below are burdensome, more for excessive verbiage, than for being overly technical—although that could exists as well.

Critique #3, title: “Electrical Conductor” (link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_conductor)

Overburdened with verbiage as shown by the first sentence, of the first paragraph: [In physics and electrical engineering, [cap]a conductor is an object or type of material which permits the flow of electric charges in one or more directions.]

Critique #4, title: “Fuel Cell” link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell)

This article is very “wordy” for general consumption. If written more in the style of technical writing (minimizing unhelpful or unnecessary words) I think it would be more consumable. A fuel cell is a device that converts the chemical energy from a fuel into electricity through [by reacting it] chemical reaction with oxygen or another oxidizing[er] agent.[1] ChrisB WIGEfan (talk) 00:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dr. Anthony!

I am writing to let you know that I made suggestions to Tree19 on June 3rd.

Kind Regards,

Helen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heleniliff (talk • contribs) 22:52, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seth, I have suggested some a few improvements to the proposed edits of one other user, User:Nightingale8283/sandbox Also, I have incorporated the suggestions made to me regarding my proposed edits, and gone live with them. Do I need to do one other review?

By the way, someone else had modified the page I intended to edit, but I think my edits still made sense so I did them anyway.

Drew.P.Branch (talk) 04:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_cell

For such an important part of electrochemistry, this article seems pretty short, especially in the cell potential section.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battery_%28electricity%29#Primary_battery_chemistries

The section on primary battery chemistry (particularly the "elaboration" subsection) is not proportional to the amount of information provided in the secondary battery chemistry comments.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_effect

I feel like "temperature controllers" in the opening paragraph should be linked so that one may view the different types of controllers or even find out what temperature controllers are if it is not known.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_reaction#Nernst_equation

The section on electrolysis of aqueous solutions is only one sentence and rather vague. I could definitely be explained better.

G Robinson263 (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finished! Posted comments on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wallace.miller/sandbox

G Robinson263 (talk) 00:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth just finished taking my edits live for assignment 6. OITowl3 (talk) 01:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, I just went live with my edits. Dsports1 (talk) 05:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, just finished my second review for assignment 5 and posted my edits for assignment 6. The page I edited was electrolysis. Thanks for another excellent term, have a good summer? Kaleb.LT (talk) 20:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Took my edits live, enjoy your summer. Tree19 (talk) 00:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anthony, I just finished posting my edits on the flow battery page. Thanks so much for a great term! I hope you have a wonderful summer! REEstudent (talk) 22:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth,

I just took my edits live. Have a great summer!

Hannah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannah.dimich (talk • contribs) 01:41, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Seth, my edits are now live and assignment 6 is complete. Nightingale8283 (talk) 18:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dr. Anthony! I posted my edits live!!! Have a great summer!!! Kind Regards, Helen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heleniliff (talk • contribs) 19:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Barbara Howe has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ddcm8991 (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

THe congressional district map for south carolina is outdated - there are 7 districts in the 113th congress now.

example here: http://www.wrhammons.com/southcarolina-congressional-districts.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.109.141 (talk) 21:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bill Fletcher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 23:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ronald T. Kadish.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:12, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:BriggsdaleCOChurch.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:CarrCOPostOffice.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:ColoradoHighway14Weld.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:05, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Bailey (U.S. politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Bailey (U.S. politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – S. Rich (talk) 22:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article And Now for a Word is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/And Now for a Word until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 12:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Race Through Dark Places is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Race Through Dark Places until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 12:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revelations (Babylon 5) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revelations (Babylon 5) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 12:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Confessions and Lamentations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confessions and Lamentations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 12:13, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grey 17 Is Missing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable by itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Guye (talk) 10:10, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Into the Fire (Babylon 5) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fancrufty unnoteworthy episode

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Guye (talk) 10:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Colorado Wiknic 2015

Who: All Wikipedia and Wikimedia users in Colorado and their families are invited. New users are specifically encouraged to attend.

What: The Great Colorado Wiknic 2015.

When: Sunday afternoon, July 5, 2015, from 12:00 to 4:00 pm MDT.

Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in Arvada. Please contact Buaidh for further information or assistance.

Please add your username to our Attendees list so we know how many folks to expect. You can subscribe to our Wikimedia Colorado e-mail list to receive notice of future Wikimedia Colorado activities.

Your hosts:  Buaidh  and  BikeSally  15:23, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)

of Nick Berg? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.188.41.0 (talk) 09:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget the Colorado Wiknic this Sunday afternoon. We hope to see you there.  Buaidh  16:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minor planet 90377 Sedna > Sedna (minor planet) discussion taking place at Talk:90377_Sedna#Odd_name. Please join in if it catches your fancy. A previous discussion took place with a result of Sedna (planetoid) which is why you are on this list. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ernest West Basden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest West Basden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 00:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Colorado Wiknic 2016

Who: All Wikipedia and Wikimedia users and their families and friends are invited.

What: The Great Colorado Wiknic 2016.

When: Sunday afternoon, June 26, 2015, from 12:00 to 4:00 pm MDT.

Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in