User talk:IPadPerson

This user may have left Wikipedia. IPadPerson has not edited Wikipedia since 13 January 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Chris Browns X album has tentatively been set for September 16, 2014 so I'd appreciate if you would leave it as is. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Breezybethel (talk • contribs) 21:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Breezybethel:: You're welcome. Not to be rude, but please be familiar with WP:ALBUM/SOURCES IPadPerson (talk) 21:49, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please change Nicki Minaj's profile picture? It's really outdated, and unflattering. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trey Flo96 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not revert my edits again without explaining why. I removed that section because it was a repetition of what was in Background and release section. prism △ 20:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, so I noticed warning that you placed on a user's talk page and, try as I might, I cannot find where they have added defamatory content to any articles whatsoever. Do you have a diff of when and how they did this? Thanks so much! Deville (Talk) 04:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "defamatory content" of IP address 94.14.112.118 is on several articles. You can go to his/her contributions page. He/she has changed articles by 63 bytes by adding "See release history" in small text (See differences between revisions for those articles). I along with other users have reverted those edits he/she made because that is disruptive editing, and has been told why and warned on his/her talk page; he/she has done this since yesterday (February 15th). I then reported him/her to administrators and he/she has now been blocked for 48 hours for his/her unconstructive contributions. --IPadPerson (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! :)

Would you change the phrase: 'As of June 2013, she has sold an estimated three million albums and ten million singles worldwide' to now he updated: 'With over 15 million singles and 4 million album sales worldwide'. Thanks. SOURCE:http://premier.ticketek.com.au/shows/show.aspx?sh=ELLIEGOU14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.41.161 (talk) 22:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is now updated.--IPadPerson (talk) 23:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted that picture because it was on her page twice with the exact same caption and everything. So maybe we should just have one copy of it on her page? Sorry, next time I'll put that in the summary.... --Divine618 (talk) 21:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IPadPerson,

Given your edits to Demi Lovato-related articles, I thought you might support this. Care to join the WikiProject if it is created?

XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 22:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IPadPerson,

I apologize if it appeared that I was making disruptive edits, I simply forgot to check for typos before I saved the changes on Paranoid (Ty Dolla Sign song)

Regards,

Bigga123 (talk) 05:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is the existing link to atrl.net/forums. If you revise your edit to remove that, it should save.—Kww(talk) 15:30, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry I am not a regular on Wikipedia but I did see a clear mistake in Rebel Wilson's age. I booked her travel for Night At The Museum 3 and can confirm that her full name is Rebel Melanie Elizabeth Wilson and her birthdate is 02/03/1986. I have scan of passport but that would be unprofessional to release. Sorry for trouble. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.72.157.71 (talk) 22:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IPadPerson,

I need some information from you. WP:VisualEditor (or Parsoid, which is its backend infrastructure) screwed up something when you made this edit. The developers are trying to figure out how to fix it, but (of course!) it works correctly for them. So could you tell me what kind of web browser and computer you're using for these edits? It would really help them narrow down the options. Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 22:21, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am using Mozilla Firefox on a Dell Inspiron One desktop computer.--IPadPerson (talk) 22:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll tell them to focus on Firefox for their testing. I assume that you're running Windows on your Dell, since that's what that model appears to ship with normally, but let me know if you're not. I really appreciate your quick response. Thanks again, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:37, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is the United Kingdom not a country and a sovereign state? --Erzan (talk) 03:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The United Kingdom IS a country and Scotland is a part of it as its own country, and you have edit-warred over it on that article repeatedly after getting reverted. Do not violate the 3RR policy, or you may be blocked for doing so.--IPadPerson (talk) 11:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the United Kingdom is a country and a sovereign state, what is the problem with Calvin Harris wikipedia entry being edited according to his citizenship, country and sovereign-state? Which is the United Kingdom. The user SnapSnap has engaged in six edits, not made any attempts at discussing the issue and has yet received a warning. --Erzan (talk) 12:10, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That user has told you that your addition of "United Kingdom" is potentially unconstructive and unhelpful. He does not need a warning for your vandalism that you commit. I reverted you twice for the exact same thing, and you're still edit warring. If you continue, you will see yourself blocked again.--IPadPerson (talk) 12:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm unclear how mentioning Dumfries, Scotland, UK on the Calvin Harris birth place is unconstructive and unhelpful? that would make many similar wikipedia entries which follow the same pattern (city, region, sovereign-state) unconstructive and unhelpful too. Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content, in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Examples of typical vandalism are adding irrelevant obscenities and crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting obvious nonsense into a page. How is editing Calvin Harris location to Dumfries, Scotland, UK vandalism?

Is it not possible to have both Scotland and the UK mentioned? --Erzan (talk) 12:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I feel I should comment: Scotland is a country, UK isn't so much a country as it is a union of countries. Scotland is part of the UK along with Wales, England, and Northern Ireland. This is why it is often ambiguous to call something "British". I would not include "UK" in ones birth location since it is not one country. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:24, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XXSNUGGUMSXX I am unsure how or where you have reached the conclusion that the UK is not a country. But every international and regional organisation recognises the UK (or formerly the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) as a country. For example the Olympics, UN, NATO, EU, WTO and OECED. I could cite many respected academic sources that describes the UK as a country and could easily list plenty of media articles from reputable media organisations from around the world that does. --Erzan (talk) 15:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the move and the reason, that I didn't quite understand, that "another Wikipedia page has the same song title", but I don't see that page or a dab that was constructed to deal with that. Care to explain, on the article's talk page? Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:10, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you have no further objections, I will be moving the article back shortly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IPadPerson, I know you don't like hearing about this, but please take more caution with your edit summaries. This can easily come off as an insult. The content itself you edit is generally fine outside of arbitrary tagging, though you do need to pay close attention to how you use edit summaries. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 18:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a minor issue, but when nominating an article for deletion, please don't wrap the AfD template in noinclude tags, as you did here. The noinclude option is designed to be used primarily for TfDs. If you put the AfD template in noinclude tags, the closing script will fail to work. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's ChrisGualtieri (submissions) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included Cliftonian (submissions), who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and Caponer (submissions), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from Reid,iain james (submissions), tiger from Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and The Lion King from Igordebraga (submissions). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to Czar (submissions) and Red Phoenix (submissions) for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 17:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brave (Sara Bareilles song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Song (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

you have got to be kidding me 5 Seconds of Summer is nothing close to pop punk do you even listen to pop-punk? The wonder years, the story so far, all time low, neck deep, man overboard, blink-182 5sos sounds NOTHING like those bands, especially that song it has NO PUNK INFLUENCE WHATSOEVER i will defend pop-punk!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.29.198 (talk) 04:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

look i'm not even saying they're a bad band or anything, they're really talented and they play actual instruments and write their own songs. but their sound is more pop/rock like hot chelle rae, allstar weekend, etc. just because they cite blink 182 and all time low as influences doesn't make them pop-punk, they legit sound nothing like those bands! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.29.198 (talk) 04:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You definitely need to stop personal attacking me and edit warring before I have to report you to ANI. You are probably not that familiar with them and carelessly removed the genre from the She Looks So Perfect article without an explanation. I suggest that you listen closely to more of their music before you carelessly remove genres, as "pop punk" was still on the band's Wikipedia article. IPadPerson (talk) 10:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not personally attacking you, I'm just stating facts. I've listened to their earlier stuff before, I knew about them for about a year now, since before they were famous. Don't assume. SOME of their early songs had pop-punk style in it, gearing more towards the pop side. but she's so perfect, not just the song but the EP itself, is so far-stretched from pop-punk music. And I'm NOT saying they are a bad band, okay they're good, they're really talented, but you can't just throw them into a genre simply because they were influenced by those kind of bands. --24.189.29.198 (talk) 06:10, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding images to an article help it. The image is of her pregnant with her second child and it's a recent picture from this year. There is a section in her article about her motherhood, so that is a perfect image for it. Natalie Portman is a good article and has an image of her pregnant with her child. LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:23, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mind telling me why you think it's not notable? Upcoming albums are considered notable if there is sufficient verifiable information on them. This article has sources verifying the release date and track listing, and its lead single is in the Top 5 of a major Billboard chart. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• My bad, I didn't look closely enough. The existing sources were all WP:PRIMARY. I added a secondary source verifying the release date, and sources verifying that "Automatic" is on five major charts. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Firstly, thank you for the excellent work you have been doing. I have two things to bring up with you if I may?

1. Notes like this would be seen as disruptive as there have been no issues with genres in the last few days. Hidden notes should ALWAYS be kept to a MINIMUM as they can become annoying and redundant.
2. When you leave an edit summary, can you please try and be a bit more detailed. For example instead of just saying "Note" say something like "adding hidden note about genres due to recent edits/vandalism".

This helps others to work out useful edits from useless ones. Many thanks. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 21:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Easy (Sheryl Crow song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CMT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I saw that you stated the information I listed on Snooki's Wikipedia page "wasn't really relevant to the article itself" and I would have to agree. The information posted was about Snooki and most, if not all, the links were sourced. I applaud your commitment to Wikipedia but I would have to disagree with you on this one particulate matter.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Girls (Jennifer Lopez song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A.K.A. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There was consensus to move the article to Chicago P.D. (TV series). You should revert to consensus and start a new discussion. Also consider a hatnote like {{Distinguish}}.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore above, I got confused with all the recent page moves.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am currently in the nomination process of getting Nicki Minaj videography up to featured list status. I was wondering whether you could take a look and possibly leave your thoughts/opposition/support for the nomination and leave any suggestions you may have to improve it. Thanks :) Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nicki Minaj videography/archive1

KaneZolanski (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gwen Stefani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Voice

Kate Upton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Other Woman

Savannah Guthrie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to David Gregory

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you keep an eye with the page? Those kids were playing around with unsourced genre changes. 183.171.165.96 (talk) 03:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Feuds discussion has been opened, it requires your alongside other users' input. ChocoLantern88 (talk) 22:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beth Behrs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bravo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Incomplete}} requires you to start a discussion on the talk page about what exactly is missing from the article you have tagged. Otherwise, people are left guessing as to why you have tagged the article and what you want to see expanded. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been invited to join the Katy Perry WikiProject, a WikiProject on the English Wikipedia dedicated to improving articles and lists related to Katy Perry. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page and add your name to the list of participants. Thank You. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 08:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to look at my tags that I put on the article because it is unacceptable as currently constructed.HotHat (talk) 07:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed her article per guidelines.HotHat (talk) 12:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would definitely be better by diving its content into sections so these issues don't stay on-going. IPadPerson (talk) 16:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kate Upton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phoenix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you do this?—Kww(talk) 14:03, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because the article on the celebrity had 292,069 views in the past 30 days and the article on the boxer only had 1,147 views in the past 30 days. When you type the first four letters of the celebrity's name, his name is the fourth that comes up and the Australian boxer does not come up unless you type its full name and gives you two options, since the celebrity is more well-known than the boxer. IPadPerson (talk) 14:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"The Australian boxer does not come up unless you type its full name" is precisely why we have those links. When people don't arrive at the article they want, they get a pointer to the article that they do want. Don't remove such links in the future.—Kww(talk) 14:51, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested, feel free to leave comments here- I'm hoping to bring Katy Perry to FA so she can be "Today's Featured Article" for her 30th birthday this upcoming October. Snuggums (talk • contributions) 23:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Home for Christmas (Danity Kane song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dawn Richard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Morin. I noticed This revert of vandalism and it was pretty good but i just want to let you know to remember to add warnings (maybe with something like Twinkle) When reverting vandalism. Thanks! Lor^Chat 02:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reminding me and I'll promise to not hesitate to give out warnings whenever reverting vandalism any more. IPadPerson (talk) 03:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the message, and fixing my fumble In ictu oculi (talk) 12:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the message, and fixing my fumble In ictu oculi (talk) 12:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in giving input here. Snuggums (talk • contributions) 03:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! WikiProject Pop music got enough support to be created! Feel free to add your username to the members list. Cheers! Erick (talk) 18:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's a citation on "Genre:Country" in the infobox. Entertainment Weekly says "Taylor Swift assembled her very own country-music Avengers at tonight’s CMA Awards," but does not said a country track. 183.171.167.168 (talk) 16:08, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's Godot13 (submissions) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C, Casliber (submissions) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's , whose contributions included featured articles Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.

The round saw this year's first featured portal, with Sven Manguard (submissions) taking Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to 12george1 (submissions) and the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on Maya Angelou's autobiographies from Figureskatingfan (submissions), a good article on the noted Czech footballer Tomáš Rosický from Cloudz679 (submissions) and a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of Sven Manguard (submissions).

The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Savannah Guthrie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Today (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DPL bot, in case you didn't know, when I cicked on fix with Dab solver, it says that the Toolserver was discontinued. Now, I will have to do so manually to the Savannah Guthrie article. Would you mind fixing the issue with the disambiguation fix page? IPadPerson (talk) 15:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not come to my talk page and litter it with irrelevant, poorly reviewed commentary. 3RR concerns continuous back and forth reverts between two parties, so you have no business cluttering my page with that. Accidentally reverting your correction, instead of restoring a previous version obviously does not fully constitute that. If I remember you have a block history, so I'd suggest you avoid harassing others pointlessly and mind your own editing habits. ––––Carmaker1 (talk) 15:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't see that coming as an harassment. :( IPadPerson (talk) 15:25, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey IPadPerson. I reverted your edit to Jimmy Kimmel Live! since you removed a gigantic chunk of content. Just wanted to let you know. Was it a mistake or a glitch? --k6ka (talk | contribs) 13:44, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I only intended to adjust a little chunk of text to that article, but it turned out to be a removal of the entire page. So yes, it was a glitch. IPadPerson (talk) 20:08, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:SergiSmiler undid its revision two times for its genre, in 'Production and Composition' section says hip hop elements. 183.171.175.217 (talk) 00:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 10:24, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you change Ariana Grande's profile picture to Break Free? And how come you can edit Ariana's but I cannot? — Preceding unsigned comment added by IArianasPrivate (talk • contribs) 10:56 am, Today (UTC−4)

An infobox article of a BLP must contain an image of that person, not screenshots of album/song covers or music videos. The reason that you may not be able to edit Ariana's article is because you may not be an autoconfirmed user since the article currently allows only autoconfirmed users to edit. IPadPerson (talk) 16:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erin McCarley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adult alternative. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Livelikemusic didn't allow us to edit anymore, he leave as a genre "pop rock", but there's no cite on article texts. 183.171.160.163 (talk) 00:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, article texts says "perfect pop-rock hooks" that is a musical idea, often a short riff, passage, or phrase, that is used in popular music to make a song appealing and to "catch the ear of the listener". 183.171.160.163 (talk) 01:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe he/she or another administrator fully protected it. IPadPerson (talk) 01:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're interested, Katy Perry is currently a featured article candidate. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 00:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would be more than welcome to add input. IPadPerson (talk) 00:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remove unreliable sources (are Popdust, Popcrush etc.) and remove Bill Lamb's (unreliable author), please? 183.171.163.191 (talk) 13:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@183.171.163.191:: Of course, per WP:ALBUM/SOURCES. IPadPerson (talk) 14:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you have been working on Jessie J's new single "Bang Bang", I'm a huge fan of hers, so I would like to ask you if you could keep in touch about the US charts, like the Billboard Hot 100, so if this song enter that chart you could be able to update it on this song's article. Waiting for your answer in my talk page. Thanks for helping. JD3rulo (talk) 21:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply] 

@JD3rulo:: Sure. IPadPerson (talk) 21:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help, I appreciate it. If you need some help to update or edit any page, you can count on me, just let me a note in my talk page and I'll support you. Thanks for answering. Have a nice day! JD3rulo (talk) 22:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You reverted out my addition to the caption of the infobox on Juju Chang as "redundant". Perhaps and seemingly so. But I was trying to clarify for whom she worked in 2007 when the photo was taken. There seems to be some murkiness in this information in the article itself. Been editing Wikipedia since January 2005. --- Wikiklrsc (talk) 23:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. IPadPerson (talk) 23:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No real problem. I've done some more editing but left the non-redundant version intact for now. Thanks. --- Wikiklrsc (talk) 02:55, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The edits were previously reverted because some charities did not have Wiki pages and were thus considered non-notable. So I deleted them without a fuss. But most of the other charities that are included in the article have their Wiki pages and are therefore notable, and not applicable for deletion under WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Therefore they will not be deleted. Don't go around threatening to block me for verifiable edits. CyrockingSmiler (talk) 16:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@CyrockingSmiler:: Please abide to the revert summaries and warnings that myself and User:Lady Lotus have inputed. Also, I am not an administrator. IPadPerson (talk)

I listen to Lady Lotus at once when he/she deletes my edits. I have followed every rule and deleted the charities when Lady Lotus told me to do so. But the rest of the charities have their own Wikipedia pages and have been included because they are notable. So how come some editors continue deleting them, even though they are notable? CyrockingSmiler (talk) 17:00, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello you told me I vandalized the Drake & Josh page but I never did and I'm worried because you said it was my final warning when I never did anything — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24lakers2 (talk • contribs) 10:50, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@24lakers2: How wouldn't you classify the incorrect dates as vandalism? And why did you wait a month and a half to bring this up? IPadPerson (talk) 12:25, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you undone a lot of information regarding the Season 9 and the whole story dvd release of how i met your mother and was wondering why as the information was referenced.JohnGormleyJG (talk) 14:42, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@JohnGormleyJG: The cover for the DVD was a copyright violation and the information was not from reliable sources. IPadPerson (talk) 14:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could we keep the text and leave the picture as their was no reason to remove that. JohnGormleyJG (talk) 16:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@JohnGormleyJG: Okay. IPadPerson (talk) 18:01, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JohnGormleyJG (talk) 18:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would be appreciated if you looked over and voted on the move request for The Pink Print to the The Pinkprint. Up to this point there hasn't been a direct response as to which spelling was correct. Nicki Minaj herself clarified the question directly stating it was written, "The Pinkprint", (https://twitter.com/NICKIMINAJ/status/497117375712329728). Leave either your support or opposition for the move here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Pink_Print#Requested_move_06_August_2014.

Thank you for your time, KaneZolanski (talk) 00:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]

@KaneZolanski: I would be more than glad to. IPadPerson (talk) 01:50, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm DanniRaw. I just signed up after reading Paris Hilton's page. I thought it would be nice to mention that her great grandfather Conrad Hilton the 2nd was Elizabeth Taylor's 1st husband and that she has tried a shot at DeeJaying in these recent years. Thanks!

@DanniRaw: I would, but that would be trivia and gaming the system. Sorry. IPadPerson (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I got the sales figures from here http://www.musicweek.com/news/read/nico-vinz-s-am-i-wrong-sells-over-100k-to-top-singles-chart/059287 you need a subscription to see it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.240.98 (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources that are subscriber-only aren't allowed on Wikipedia. You'll need something else. IPadPerson (talk) 12:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On the Nasty (Pixie Lott song) page it links to this page http://www.musicweek.com/businessanalysis/read/official-charts-analysis-elbow-album-sells-46k-to-hit-no-1/057932 which is subscription only. This boy called andrew (talk) 12:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IPadPerson, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism, spam and blatantly unconstructive edits; using it to revert any other type of edit - such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with - can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, as some admins do not warn if they become aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, you should use a manual edit summary instead of the rollback tool. For practice, you may wish to review Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 14:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Acalamari: Thanks a lot! I totally appreciate it. IPadPerson (talk) 14:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you could look at the issue Kiprelle user, is adding repeated references and see that reverse is useless.--Damián (talk) 20:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Damián80: Of course, since the page is on my watchlist. IPadPerson (talk) 21:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is obvious that the user ignores the message; think you have to ask for help from an administrator.--Damián (talk) 21:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Damián80: That's a good idea. IPadPerson (talk) 21:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ipadperson, the single article also needs extensive eyes. I'm tired of reverting vandals and fanboys. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 07:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@IndianBio: You're absolutely right. It definitely needs to be at a higher level of protection, or maybe a pending changes protection, since there was a lot of vandalism since the article was created. IPadPerson (talk) 10:56, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In what specific way did I vandalise any Wikipedia article, including Rihanna? Mvpo666 (talk) 22:46, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Mvpo666: It was NOT vandalism anyway, to make this clear. You didn't explain why you removed an additional punctuation. IPadPerson (talk) 22:48, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@IPadPerson: I edited the page again, this time adding a description and a reference to my edit. Is that better? Mvpo666 (talk) 22:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Mvpo666: Yep. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 23:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my Cody Simpson edit as you consider the source to not be good enough. It may be a celeb site but most of his other sources are. The source in question also has comments posted from his personal twitter account therefore the information posted is reliable.

The cover photo you removed from the Flawless page came from a reliable source, so is there any explanation of why you removed it?! ChicagoWiz 22:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was unseeable. That's why. You might have mislabeled the infobox category. IPadPerson (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IPadPerson I want you to know that information you have changed from Candice Swanepoel's carrer section was false.You can check it from models.com .Candice Swanepoel has 3 editorials for Harper's Bazaar US but she has not any cover for the magazine For your information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modelslover1 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The final of the 2014 WikiCup begins in a few short minutes! Our eight finalists are listed below, along with their placement in Round 4:

1. Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer, finished top of Pool A and was the round's highest scorer. Godot is a featured picture specialist, claiming large numbers of points due to high-quality scans of historical documents, especially banknotes.
2. Casliber (submissions) is a WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist every year since 2010. In the semi-final, he was Pool B's highest scorer. Cas's points primarily come from articles on the natural sciences.
3. Czar (submissions) was Pool A's runner-up. Czar's points come mostly from content related to independent video games, including both articles and topics.
4. Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Pool B's runner-up. Another featured picture specialist, many of Adam's points come from the restoration of historical media. He has been a WikiCup finalist twice before.
5. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) won the WikiCup in 2012 and 2013, and enters this final as the first wildcard. She focuses on biology-related articles, and has worked on several high-importance articles.
6. 12george1 (submissions) is the second wildcard. George's points come primarily from meteorology-related articles. This year and last year, George was the first person in the competition to score.
7. Sturmvogel 66 (submissions), the third wildcard, was the 2010 champion and a finalist last year. His writes mostly on military history, especially naval history.
8. Bloom6132 (submissions), the fourth and final wildcard, has participated in previous WikiCups, but not reached any finals. Bloom's points are mostly thanks to did you knows, featured lists and good articles related to sport and national symbols.

We say goodbye to this year's semi-finalists. Matty.007 (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), WikiRedactor (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), Yellow Evan (submissions), Prism (submissions) and Cloudz679 (submissions) have all performed well to reach this stage of the competition, and we hope they will all be joining us again next year.

There are two upcoming competitions unrelated to the WikiCup which may be of interest to those who receive this newsletter. The Stub Contest will run through September, and revolves around expanding stub articles, especially high-importance or old stubs. In addition, a proposal has been made for a new competition, the GA Cup, which the organisers plan to run next year. This competition is based on the WikiCup and aims to reduce the good article review backlog.

There is now a thread for brainstorming on how next year's WikiCup competition should work. Please come along and share your thoughts- What works? What doesn't work? What needs changing? Signups for next year's competition will be open soon; we will be in touch. If, at this stage of the competition, you are keen to help the with the WikiCup, please do what you can to participate in review processes. Our finalists will find things much easier if the backlogs at good article candidates, featured article candidates, featured picture candidates and the rest are kept at a minimum. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IPadPerson. I have heard that WP:Twinkle can generate 3RR reports, but have never tried doing that. Was your recent report at WP:AN3 made with Twinkle? If so could you link to how that is done? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 21:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: Yes it was. The way to report edit warring using Twinkle is that you go to a user's page/contributions, fill out the information about where on Wikipedia is the edit warring escalating, and you must also include the reverts by the one you reported on that page. You may want to be more specific about it in the comment box. You then click Submit and it will automatically direct you to the 3RR noticeboard. IPadPerson (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I can see the 3RR submission screen now. I assume 'Submit query' opens an actual report on the noticeboard? EdJohnston (talk) 04:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: My pleasure. IPadPerson (talk) 07:55, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Wifione ^Message 16:48, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is that link supposed to mean? IPadPerson (talk) 17:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you apparently had thanked me for a vandalism revert that I had done on Madison Beer. I responded with "You're welcome", and gave the link that documented the "thanks" that you had given me, so that you could understand the context of "You're welcome" :) It's not meant to be so complicated. Wifione ^Message 17:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sup. I directed the session for a separate article (VEVO Lift: Bridgit Mendler). Thanks and have a nice day. Shane Harper 4 Life (talk) 16:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Shane Harper 4 Life: No you didn't. You redirected it by blanking the section without an explanation. You have received several warnings for such behavior, and you will be blocked if you continue. IPadPerson (talk) 16:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for the heads-up. Accidentally missed some syntax - I'll repost it, but I'll clean it up first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SantosPhillipCarlo (talk • contribs) 19:58, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SantosPhillipCarlo: Trivia is not allowed whatsoever per WP:TRIVIA. IPadPerson (talk) 21:25, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seriously arguing that BLPNAME applies to the name of child of a notable person, name which is widely reported in reliable sources? There are no issues of privacy here whatsoever (which is what BLPNAME is trying to protect). - Cwobeel (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwobeel: Yes. Per policy. IPadPerson (talk) 21:21, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it does not apply as discussed at WP:BLP/N, see a good explanation here: Talk:Chelsea_Clinton#WP:BLPNAME_does_not_apply_here.2C_line_by_line - Cwobeel (talk) 21:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IPadPerson. Cwobeell is correct- it is valid to include as long as it is reliably sourced. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwobeel and SNUGGUMS: Okay, I'll stop edit warring. Thanks anyway. IPadPerson (talk) 22:14, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In one month's time, we will know our WikiCup 2014 champion. Newcomer Godot13 (submissions) has taken a strong lead with a featured list (historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876) and a raft of featured pictures. Reigning champion Cwmhiraeth (submissions) is in second place with a number of high-importance biology articles, including new FA Isopoda and new GA least weasel. Casliber (submissions), who is in his fifth WikiCup final, is in third, with featured articles Pictor and Epacris impressa.

Signups for the 2015 WikiCup are open. All Wikipedians, new and experienced, are warmly invited to sign up for the competition. Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may also like to sign up for the GA Cup, a new WikiCup-inspired competition which revolves around completing good article reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unclear on what you were asking for in regards to semi-protection for the page. The page is already semi-protected. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 19:32, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@CambridgeBayWeather: I meant to request for a change in protection, but I didn't know it would end up in the reduction in protection section. IPadPerson (talk) 19:57, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I take it you were looking for full protection then? I wouldn't go with that right now. They only added it once and you warned them. If they return then it could be reconsidered. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 20:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that the well-established fact about Hannah Davis & Derek Jeter that I posted days ago, and that you removed, does lack published sources, ones that I will be happy to add ASAP: Has been in a relationship with baseball legend Derek Jeter since 2012, including very public appearances along side him and his parents during his highly celebrated final career games in September 2014.

...BUT, can you please tell me why you considered the post so outrageously "derogatory" that you had to immediately threaten me--in my first-ever such scolding--with the following?: "This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Hannah Davis (model), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. IPadPerson (talk) 14:39, 4 October 2014 (UTC)"Mwprods (talk) 14:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC) [reply]

@Mwprods: Look at your talk page history and the article history. IPadPerson (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the note, but it's probably unnecessary. These are socks of JoMontNW and their interest in editing these articles is apparently a manifestation of OCD, not a sincere misunderstanding of the facts or of Wikipedia policies. Dwpaul ^Talk 21:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Dwpaul: Yeah, it looked like a sock alright. IPadPerson (talk) 22:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,actually sometimes twitter can be used as a source. However it should be used as a reference as long as:

• the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;
• it does not involve claims about third parties;
• it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
• there is no reas