Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States establishing...

may differ by region—for the US see Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service; for Australia, see Telstra v Desktop Marketing Systems. Erik Möller...

v Taylor 1991. Nimmer 2010, p. 6–6. Ashton-Tate Corporation v Ross 1990. Patry 2012, p. 5–48. Childress v Taylor 1991, p. 507. "Feist Publications v....

Supreme Court precedent Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service, in which it was found that the information within a telephone directory (individual...

be illegal, in the United States the courts ruled in Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service that duplication of facts is allowable. U.S. courts...

sine qua non of copyright in the United States (see Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service). This has not stopped database owners lobbying for...

The Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Co. held that the work must be independently created...

Xbox One Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co. (also Feist), a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States Feist (singer) (born...

its telephone access number. In 1991, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (in Feist v. Rural) that telephone companies do not have a copyright on telephone listings...

carries the burden of proof that infringement occurred. Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Ho v. Taflove Functionality doctrine Stock character Bently...